PER CURIAM:
The district court correctly held that the transaction which formed the basis of plaintiff-appellant's claim in this action was not covered by the Consumer Leasing Act of 1976 (15 U.S.C. § 1667) and section 226.15 of Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 226.15), or the Truth-in-Lending Act (15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.) and section 226.8 of Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 226.8).
The judgment appealed from is
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.