IN RE MARRIAGE OF STENQUIST

Docket No. L.A. 30718.

21 Cal.3d 779 (1978)

582 P.2d 96

148 Cal. Rptr. 9

In re the Marriage of RICHARD WILLIAM and MARILYN BETTY STENQUIST. RICHARD WILLIAM STENQUIST, Appellant, v. MARILYN BETTY STENQUIST, Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

August 7, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hervey, Mitchell, Ashworth & Keeney and Thomas Ashworth III for Appellant Husband.

Rand & Day and Roland B. Day for Appellant Wife.

Gertrude D. Chern as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellant Wife.


OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

Retiring after 26 years of military service, husband received a "disability" pension of 75 percent of his basic pay in lieu of a "retirement" pension at 65 percent of basic pay.1 Although a military "retirement" pension is a community asset (In re Marriage of Fithian (1974) 10 Cal.3d 592, 604 [111 Cal.Rptr. 369

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases