In re SUGAR INDUSTRY ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
STOTTER & CO., INC., Appellant,
v.
AMSTAR CORPORATION, Borden, Inc., and its Subsidiaries, Colonial Sugar Company, North American Sugar Industries, Industrial Sugars, Inc., Sugar Refinery of Palm Beach, Inc. (formerly Florida Sugar Refinery, Inc.), CPC International, Inc., Michigan Sugar Company, National Home Products Corporation, The National Sugar Refining Company, Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., and SuCrest Corporation, Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 12, 1978.
Decided March 6, 1978.
Rehearing Denied July 5, 1978.
As Amended August 14, 1978.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Harvey S. Kronfeld, Paul C. Madden, Hudson, Wilf & Kronfeld, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Robert M. Landis, Stephen A. Stack, Jr., Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., William E. Willis, James H. Carter, William M. Dallas, Jr., Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, Frederick M. Porter, Chris G. Gunderson, Jr., Amstar Corporation, New York City, for Amstar Corp.
Theodore W. Flowers, Edward C. Mengel, Jr., White & Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., Walter W. Kocher, Edward A. Matto, c/o Borden, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, for Borden, Inc., Colonial Sugar Co., North American Sugar Ind., Industrial Sugars, Inc., Sugar Refinery of Palm Beach, Inc. (formerly Florida Sugar Refinery, Inc.).
John G. Harkins, Jr., Lloyd R. Ziff, Richard M. Bernstein, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., John E. Simpson, Miller, Beckmann & Simpson, Savannah, Ga., for Savannah Foods & Industries, Inc.
Benjamin M. Quigg, Jr., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., Gordon B. Spivack, John N. McBaine, Lord, Day & Lord, New York City, for CPC International, Inc.
Timothy D. Wittlinger, Hill, Lewis, Adams, Goodrich & Tait, Detroit, Mich., for Michigan Sugar Co.
Henry W. Cornell, III, Berg & Cornell, Buffalo, N. Y., for National Home Products Corp.
Robert L. Ellis, Jeffrey I. Klein, Goldstein, Shames, Hyde, Wirth, Bezahler & Cahill, New York City, for RSN Projects, Inc. (formerly The National Sugar Refining Co., Inc.).
Laurence Greenwald, Jay P. Mayesh, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, New York City, S. Gordon Elkins, James A. Young, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for SuCrest Corp.
Before ADAMS and WEIS, Circuit Judges, and COOLAHAN, District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In this antitrust action it is alleged that defendant refiners of sugar have engaged in a conspiracy to fix the price of that product. At least two of the defendants use the sugar to manufacture candy which they sell to the plaintiff wholesaler. The question raised in this appeal is whether the plaintiff has run into an [Illinois] brick wall in his efforts to secure treble damages arising out of his candy purchases...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
