Per Curiam.
In this nonjury case defendant has been found guilty of petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25). Assuming, arguendo, that the testimony did not establish defendant's intent to obtain property by false promise to "a moral certainty" (Penal Law, § 155.05, subd 2, par [d]), there is ample evidence in the record to establish defendant's larcenous intent to withhold property from its owner, as defined in section 155.00 and subdivision 1...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
