1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 87 Wn.2d
  5. 87 Wn.2d 536 (1976)
 

KING COUNTY WATER DIST. v. REVIEW BD.

No. 44043.

87 Wn.2d 536 (1976)

554 P.2d 1060

KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 54, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Hall, for appellant King County Water District No. 54.

John H. Rayback, pro se, and for appellant Bernard.

Slade Gorton, Attorney General, Walter E. Webster, Special Assistant, and Robert J. Verzani, for respondents.

UTTER, J.

Acting pursuant to RCW 35.13A, the City of Des Moines took steps to assume the jurisdiction, facilities, and assets of King County Water District No. 54. The proposed assumption was submitted to the King County Boundary Review Board, as required by RCW 36.93, and the board approved the proposal. The board's decision was in turn appealed to the Superior Court by the water district and residents of the district. District No. 54 sought reversal on the grounds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases