1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 11 Cal.3d
  5. 11 Cal.3d 842 (1974)
 

CONOVER v. HALL

Docket No. Sac. 7972.

11 Cal.3d 842 (1974)

523 P.2d 682

114 Cal. Rptr. 842

SALLY LEE CONOVER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JAMES M. HALL, as Secretary, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

July 2, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Elizabeth Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, and N. Eugene Hill, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

Daniel S. Brunner, Valerie Vanaman, Clifford Sweet, F. Hayden Curry, Philip Goar and Ralph Santiago Abascal for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

Once again we are called upon to determine the validity of a state welfare provision enacted as part of the Welfare Reform Act of 1971.1 In this case we examine section 11451.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, which establishes a standard $50 per month work-expense allowance for all expenses other than child care expenses, regardless of a recipient's actual employment-related...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases