1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 124 N.J.
  5. 124 N.J. Super. 94 (1973)
 

BUFF v. GIGLIO

124 N.J. Super. 94 (1973)

304 A.2d 771

EDISON BUFF, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS J. BUFF & SON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PIETRO GIGLIO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 21, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert New argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Brenner, New & Brenner, attorneys).

Mr. Jerrold B. Goldstein argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Goldstein & Toto, attorneys).

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, MATTHEWS and CRAHAY.

PER CURIAM.

In this contract action plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant entered on a jury verdict in the County District Court and from the denial of his motion for a judgment n.o.v. (R. 4:40-2).

Plaintiff, a steam pressing appliance dealer, instituted this action demanding $1,650 which represented the unpaid balance on two contracts for the sale of used and rebuilt machinery to defendant, a custom tailor. The form complaint

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases