1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 348 F.Supp.
  5. 348 F.Supp. 629 (1972)
 

FORMIGLI CORPORATION v. FOX

Civ. A. No. 44343.

348 F.Supp. 629 (1972)

FORMIGLI CORPORATION v. William L. FOX, Individually and t/a Foxcroft Square Company, et al.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

September 12, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond W. Midgett, Jr., Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

J. Paul Erwin, Jr., White & Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The Parties and Jurisdiction

1. Plaintiff, Formigli Corporation, is incorporated in Delaware and is successor by merger to Formigli Corporation, which at the time of commencement of this action was incorporated in New Jersey and had its principal place of business in New Jersey ("Formigli...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases