1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 45 Wis.2d
  5. 45 Wis.2d 550 (1970)
 

YORK v. STATE

Nos. State 9, 10, 65.

45 Wis.2d 550 (1970)

173 N.W.2d 693

YORK, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error. BOWIE, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 3, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error James C. York there was a brief and oral argument by Alvin R. Ugent of Milwaukee.

For the plaintiff in error Earl David Bowie there was a brief and oral argument by Gregory Gramling, Jr., of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Michael Ash, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and E. Michael McCann, district attorney.

WILKIE, J.

As to the conviction of both defendants, one issue appears in common to both cases: Should the trial court have excluded the testimony of Detective Cornell that the piece of cloth found at the burglary scene and Bowie's coat were similar?

We assume that both defendants sufficiently objected to the introduction of this testimony.1

Objection is made to the testimony of Detective Cornell regarding the piece of cloth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases