1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 276 Cal.App.2d
  5. 276 Cal.App.2d 680 (1969)
 

HANBERRY v. HEARST CORP.

Docket No. 9332.

276 Cal.App.2d 680 (1969)

81 Cal. Rptr. 519

ZAYDA HANBERRY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HEARST CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

October 8, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy B. Woolsey for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Haight, Lyon, Smith & Nye, Charles B. Smith and Henry F. Walker for Defendant and Respondent.

AULT, J. pro tem.*

Appellant's third amended complaint is in eight causes of action, only four of which involve respondent Hearst Corporation, (second, third, seventh and eighth). The trial court sustained Hearst's general demurrer to each of these causes of action without leave to amend and entered its judgment of dismissal. The appeal is from that judgment. The two other named defendants, Akron and Victor B. Handal & Bros., Inc....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases