1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 348 F.Supp.
  5. 348 F.Supp. 230 (1969)
 

KNICKERBOCKER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Civ. No. 68-66.

348 F.Supp. 230 (1969)

Roger KNICKERBOCKER, Plaintiff, v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Illinois.

Supplemental Opinion June 9, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lowell C. McGowen, Clayton, Mo., N. Y. Dowell, Mt. Vernon, Ill., and John M. Ferguson, Belleville, Ill., for plaintiff.

Robert H. Marquis, Gen. Counsel, T. V. A., Thomas A. Pedersen, Asst. Gen. Counsel, T. V. A., Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Paul T. Dunn, Attys., T. V. A., Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant.

JUERGENS, Chief Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's jury demand alleges that plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial; that this is an action to review the administrative decision of the Tennessee Valley Authority, which was rendered in accordance with the terms of the "Disputes" clause of the contract; that Court consideration is confined to a review of the administrative record, without the introduction

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases