PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT CO. v. STATE TAX COM'N


437 P.2d 473 (1968)

PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Successor in Interest to the California Oregon Power Company, Appellant, v. STATE TAX Commission, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon. En Banc.

Decided February 14, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerard K. Drummond, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Rives & Rodgers, Portland.

Theodore W. deLooze, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., and Donald C. Seymour, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before PERRY, C.J., and SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, HOLMAN, LUSK and WOODRICH, JJ.


LUSK, Justice.

This is an appeal by Pacific Power & Light Company (PP&L) from a decree of the Tax Court affirming an order of the State Tax Commission which denied the corporation's claim for a refund of alleged overpayment of its 1961 corporate excise tax. 2 OTR 420.

PP&L is a Maine corporation which does business in Oregon and other states. It brought this proceeding as the successor in interest to California...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases