1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 64 Cal.2d
  5. 64 Cal.2d 647 (1966)
 

HUNTINGDON v. CROWLEY

Docket No. L.A. 27702.

64 Cal.2d 647 (1966)

414 P.2d 382

51 Cal. Rptr. 254

TERRY HUNTINGDON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ARTHUR CROWLEY, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard M. Redlich and Sydney M. Williams for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Arthur Crowley, in pro. per., Crowley & Goffin and Ron Swearinger for Defendant and Respondent.

MOSK, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for defendant in a paternity suit. (Civ. Code, §§ 196a, 231.)

The initial question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in declining to admit medical testimony based on a system of blood grouping that was still in the experimental stage at the time it was offered; we answer this question in the negative. The second principal issue is whether the court committed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases