1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 64 Cal.2d
  5. 64 Cal.2d 379 (1966)
 

ENTZ v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO.

Docket No. Sac. 7613.

64 Cal.2d 379 (1966)

412 P.2d 382

50 Cal. Rptr. 190

HOWARD W. ENTZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 31, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fitzwilliam, Memering, Stumbos & DeMers and T.D. Bolling, Jr., for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Johnson, Davies & Greve and Claire H. Greve for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, and for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in a declaratory relief action extending coverage of an insurance policy to additional insured under a "loading and unloading" clause in the policy.

Facts: Mr. Pruitt, a cement worker, was injured when struck by an angle iron falling from atop an iron fence that was being erected by plaintiffs, doing business as Capitol Iron Works (hereinafter referred to as "Capitol").

Capitol supplied the fence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases