1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 341 F.2d
  5. 341 F.2d 756 (1965)
 

SURPRENANT MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. N. L R. B.

No. 15592.

341 F.2d 756 (1965)

SURPRENANT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

February 27, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew E. Murray, Chicago, Ill. (Richard L. Marcus, John D. O'Brien, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for petitioner.

Robert A. Armstrong, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Lee M. Modjeska, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MILLER and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Surprenant Manufacturing Company, hereinafter referred to as Surprenant, seeks a review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued on September 11, 1963. In its answer to the petition, the Board has requested enforcement of the order.

Surprenant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of insulated wire and cable, with its principal place of business in Clinton, Massachusetts. It transacts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases