STATE v. DAY


236 Or. 458 (1964)

389 P.2d 30

STATE OF OREGON v. DAY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 13, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis F. Yunker, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was George A. Haslett, Jr., Portland.

Lewis B. Hampton, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of sodomy, and appeals.

The evidence discloses that the act of sodomy for which defendant was tried and convicted was committed as an act of entertainment at an evening stag party.

1. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in limiting the extent of her cross-examination of a Portland policeman who had attended the party. It appears from the testimony that other disgusting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases