EXTINE, v. WILLIAMSON MIDWEST

No. 38505.

176 Ohio St. 403 (1964)

EXTINE, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAMSON MIDWEST, INC., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 1, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Parker & Fenton, for appellant.

Messrs. Eastman, Stichter, Smith & Bergman and Mr. F. E. Wolf, for appellee.


HERBERT, J.

The basic question presented here is whether the agreement, supra, is valid in whole or in part. The courts both here and in England have definitely modified the early English rule of rigid construction of agreements in restraint of trade to meet an ever growing and expanding economy.

Originally it was held that all agreements in restraint of trade were void as being against public policy. Mitchel v. Reynolds (1711), 1 P. Wms...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases