1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 222 Cal.App.2d
  5. 222 Cal.App.2d 831 (1963)
 

EPSTEIN v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD

Docket No. 26988.

222 Cal.App.2d 831 (1963)

35 Cal. Rptr. 642

FRANK EPSTEIN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

December 4, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, and Conrad Lee Klein, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

O'Melveny & Myers, Sidney H. Wall, Kevin O'Connell and Donald M. Wessling as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

Apple & Cohen, Irving D. Apple and Theodore A. Cohen for Plaintiff and Respondent.

HERNDON, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court granting respondent a peremptory writ of mandate commanding appellant California Horse Racing Board to set aside its decision and order of March 19, 1962, by which it determined that respondent should not be granted permission to engage in parimutuel wagering and should not be permitted access to racing enclosures within its jurisdiction.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases