1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 24 Misc.2d
  5. 24 Misc.2d 67 (1960)
 

DAVID v. BAUMAN

24 Misc.2d 67 (1960)

Preston David et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert Bauman, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Marilyn R. Messina et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert P. Bauman et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.

February 3, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emile Z. Berman for plaintiffs. (Action No. 1.)

Max Tacouni and Nathan Grossgold for plaintiffs. (Action No. 2.)

Lawless & Lynch for Robert Bauman, defendant.

Casper B. Ughetta for Preston David, defendant. (Action No. 2.)

BERNARD S. MEYER, J.

The question presented by this omnibus motion is whether after plaintiffs in this action (Action No. 1) have been granted summary judgment and a date has been set for assessment of damages, the plaintiffs in another action (Action No. 2) against a common defendant growing out of the same accident should be permitted to intervene, or a joint trial or consolidation of the two cases be ordered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases