DAILY v. SOMBERG


28 N.J. 372 (1958)

146 A.2d 676

ALPH DAILY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HAROLD M. SOMBERG AND JOHN J. FLANAGAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 1, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Chazen argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Nathan Baker, of counsel; Messrs. Baker, Garber & Chazen, attorneys).

Mr. H. Curtis Meanor argued the cause for the respondent Harold M. Somberg, and Mr. William P. Braun, Sr., argued the cause for the respondent John J. Flanagan (Mr. Arthur J. Blake, of counsel; Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys for defendant-respondent Harold M. Somberg; Messrs. Braun & Hoey, attorneys for defendant-respondent John J. Flanagan).


The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division from the summary judgment which the Law Division had entered in favor of the defendants. See Daily v. Somberg, 49 N.J.Super. 469 (1958). We certified on our own motion.

On January 14, 1954 the plaintiff was seriously injured in an automobile accident in Ohio. He was in an Ohio hospital for almost a month and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases