STATE v. HURLIMAN


143 Conn. 502 (1956)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHARLES HURLIMAN

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 19, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Ganim, with whom, on the brief, was Raymond W. Ganim, for the appellant (defendant).

George R. Tiernan, prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE and DALY, JS.


INGLIS, C. J.

The defendant was charged with and convicted of the crime of "selling or exposing for sale certain goods, wares or merchandise" on Sunday in violation of § 2492c of the 1953 Cumulative Supplement (as amended, Cum. Sup. 1955, § 3302d). He has appealed, assigning as error the overruling of his claim that the statute is unconstitutional.

There is no dispute as to the facts. The defendant was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases