ALDOM v. BOROUGH OF ROSELAND


42 N.J. Super. 495 (1956)

127 A.2d 190

ROBERT S. ALDOM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF ROSELAND, A MUNICIPAL CORP., JOHN BAKER, MAYOR, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 27, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Roy J. Grimley argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III, argued the cause for the respondents Borough of Roseland, et als. (Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys).

Mr. Everett B. Smith argued the cause for the respondents Henry Becker & Son, Inc., Farms Inc., Henry E. Becker, et al. (Mr. Walter G. Brandley, attorney).

Mr. Milton Bruck argued the cause for the respondents Jennie Rubenstein, et al. (Messrs. Bruck and Bigel, attorneys).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

This appeal concerns the validity of an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance of the Borough of Roseland. A number of citizens and taxpayers initiated the challenge by procedure in lieu of prerogative writ. The Law Division sustained the municipal action.

Roseland is a small suburban community in northwest Essex County, of about 2,300 acres and with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases