ROSELLE v. WRIGHT


21 N.J. 400 (1956)

122 A.2d 506

PIETRO ROSELLE, VERONICA ROSELLE, VINCENT APICE, ANNA APICE, FRANK MARINARO AND THERESA MARINARO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THOMAS WRIGHT, JR., BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 30, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Bort argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

The issue here concerns the legal sufficiency of an amendment to the Township of Livingston's zoning ordinance adopted May 31, 1955, excluding from a Business district 27 enumerated "buildings and uses," "storage garages" among them, but permitting "private and public garages" in all such districts. The preexisting regulations did not forbid "storage garages" in a Business zone. The amendment also increased from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases