1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 146 F.Supp.
  5. 146 F.Supp. 59 (1956)
 

POMEROY v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC.

Civ. No. 8114.

146 F.Supp. 59 (1956)

Rensler POMEROY, doing business as Bend Specialized Service, Plaintiff, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, Inc., a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Oregon.

September 18, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vergeer & Samuels and Charles S. Crookham, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Black, Kendall & Fain, Portland, Or., for defendant.

SOLOMON, District Judge.

Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted.

Comment.

Plaintiff filed an action for damages against Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., a mercantile agency, in which he alleged that the defendant maliciously published and circulated false statements to his creditors.

Among other defenses, Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., contends that the circulation of its credit report was limited to only those subscribers who specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases