HAMMAC v. SKINNER

2 Div. 365.

89 So.2d 70 (1956)

Roy HAMMAC v. Bert SKINNER et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied August 2, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pitts & Pitts, Selma, for appellant.

Pettus, Fuller, Reeves & Stewart, Selma, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

On this appeal the important question is whether the bill in equity shows a right of complainants on the rescission of a transaction to recover expenses which they incurred in preparing to utilize the property purchased.

Complainants, to whom we will refer as appellees, and respondent to whom we will refer as appellant, made an agreement, exhibit A to the bill of complaint, which is as follows:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases