BUCINO v. MALONE


12 N.J. 330 (1953)

96 A.2d 669

FRANK BUCINO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ARTHUR C. MALONE, CITY CLERK OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 30, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank G. Schlosser argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Otmar J. Pellet argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Dominick J. Marrone, attorney).

Mr. Joseph Lanigan argued the cause for the intervenor (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney-General).


The opinion of the court was delivered by VANDERBILT, C.J.

This appeal questions the constitutionality of the Faulkner Act, L. 1950, c. 210, N.J.S.A. 40:69A-1 et seq.

The facts are not in dispute. Since 1915 the City of Hoboken has been governed under the Walsh Act, R.S. 40:70-1 et seq., by a board of five commissioners. On May 8, 1951 the present commissioners were elected for a term of four years. Soon after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases