1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 9 N.J.
  5. 9 N.J. 548 (1952)
 

PYATT v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN

9 N.J. 548 (1952)

89 A.2d 1

EDWARD M. PYATT, CHARLES W. SMITH, STEPHEN J. BRISKEY, ARNOLD B. ENGELHARDT, EDWARD B. DIX, AND J.C. GRIFFITH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, AND ART COLOR PRINTING COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT BUSINESS IN THIS STATE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 26, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph J. Mutnick argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. John E. Toolan argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.

This appeal to the Appellate Division, certified of our own motion, brings up a judgment entered in the Law Division which adjudged two ordinances adopted December 28, 1949, by the Mayor and Council of the Borough of Dunellen to be valid, and dismissed the complaint of appellants and others in lieu of prerogative writ to set the ordinances aside.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases