1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 36 Cal.2d
  5. 36 Cal.2d 602 (1951)
 

EARL v. SAKS & CO.

Docket Nos. L.A. 21069, 21337.

36 Cal.2d 602 (1951)

226 P.2d 340

MRS. RICHARD EARL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAKS AND COMPANY (a Corporation), Defendant and Respondent; A.K. BARBEE, Appellant. SAKS AND COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. A.K. BARBEE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

January 19, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. L. Nichols, Ivan Miller, William R. Law, R.S. McLaughlin & McClean & Petty for Appellant.

Thomas D. Mercola for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Wright, Wright, Green & Wright, Loyd Wright and Herschel B. Green for Defendant and Respondent.

SCHAUER, J.

A.K. Barbee appeals from judgments, in consolidated actions hereinafter described, that respondent Mrs. Richard Earl is the owner of a certain mink coat and that Barbee owes respondent Saks and Company $3,981.25. He contends that an asserted sale of the coat to him by Saks, and an asserted gift of the coat by him to Mrs. Earl, were voidable, and were rescinded by him, because his consent thereto was induced by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases