1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 8 N.J.
  5. 8 N.J. 201 (1951)
 

MUELLER v. TECHNICAL DEVICES CORP.

8 N.J. 201 (1951)

84 A.2d 620

CHESTER MUELLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TECHNICAL DEVICES CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND LESLIE E. ROBERTS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. CHESTER MUELLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 26, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward R. McGlynn, argued the cause for the appellants Technical Devices Corporation and Leslie E. Roberts (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys).

Mr. Charles H. Tuttle, of the New York bar, argued the cause for the appellant, Seaboard Commercial Corporation (Mr. Thornton C. Land, attorney; Mr. Lloyd V. Admirall and Mr. John S. Brittain, of the New York bar, on the brief).

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the causes for the respondent (Mr. Robert W. Brady, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Essex County Court in the sum of $16,500 entered in favor of the plaintiff as the result of a jury verdict. The appeal, taken to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court, has been certified here on our own motion.

The two suits involved in this appeal were consolidated for trial, that against Technical Devices Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases