BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
The appellant was tried and convicted in the lower court for the violation of the prohibition law; the specific charge being that he unlawfully had whiskey in his possession.
The evidence in this case was without dispute or conflict, as there was no evidence offered by the defendant.
That for the State consisted of the testimony of the Sheriff of the county, and also of a State highway patrolman. This evidence made out a complete...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
