logo.png">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

WILLIAMS v. OHIO DEPT. OF REHAB. & CORR.

No. 89-11406.

61 Ohio Misc.2d 699 (1991)

WILLIAMS v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION.

Court of Claims of Ohio.

Decided April 12, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel R. Williams, pro se.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Christopher C. Keller, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant.


SHOEMAKER, Judge.

On July 9, 1990, this matter came to trial before a referee of this court. On October 25, 1990, the referee issued a report, attached hereto as an appendix, wherein he recommended judgment for defendant.

Civ.R. 53 states that "[a] party may, within fourteen days of the filing of the report, serve and file written objections to the referee's report." Plaintiff has not filed an objection to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    UNIVERSAL-OIL PRODUCTS CO | 31 F.Supp. 665 (1939) | supp6651492 | Leagle.com
     

    UNIVERSAL-OIL PRODUCTS CO. v. GLOBE OIL & REFINING CO.

    No. 10744.

    31 F.Supp. 665 (1939)

    UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO. v. GLOBE OIL & REFINING CO.

    District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

    Rehearing Denied November 29, 1939.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Pam, Hurd & Reichmann, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

    Ames, Thiess, Olson & Mecklenburger, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


    HOLLY, District Judge.

    Defendant (hereinafter referred to as Globe) has filed its petition herein asking for a rehearing on the issue of res adjudicata. It is averred in the petition that subsequent to the closing of proofs on that issue the Root Refining Company (hereinafter referred to as Root) settled its controversy with Universal Oil Products Company and withdrew its petition then pending in the District Court of Delaware for leave to file a bill in the nature...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases