1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 32 F.2d
  5. 32 F.2d 390 (1929)
 

MELLON v. INTERNATIONAL SHOE CO.

No. 3470.

32 F.2d 390 (1929)

MELLON v. INTERNATIONAL SHOE CO. et al.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

April 18, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Hoy, of Boston, Mass., and Hogan & Hogan, of Providence, R. I., for plaintiff.

Joseph Wentworth and Choate, Hall & Stewart, all of Boston, Mass., for defendants.

MORTON, District Judge.

As an original question it is certainly arguable whether the statutory provision for written notice of the petition and bond for removal constitutes an essential step in removal proceedings. That question has, however, been settled in this court by the decision of Judge Dodge. Arthur v. Maryland Casualty Co., 216 F. 386. Assuming it to be an essential step, I do not think that anything which counsel for the plaintiff said or did, as stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases