1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 212 U.S.
  5. 212 U.S. 278 (1909)
 

THOMAS v. TEXAS

No. 6.

212 U.S. 278 (1909)

THOMAS v. STATE OF TEXAS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 23, 1909.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Noah Allen and Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Robert Vance Davidson, Attorney General of the State of Texas, and Mr. James DuBose Walthall, for defendant in error.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

It is not contended that the laws of Texas, under which grand and petit juries are selected, are in themselves discriminating and in violation of the Constitution of the United States. It is admitted by plaintiff in error that neither the constitution nor statutes of Texas prescribed any rule for, or mode of procedure

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases