BUDD v. NEW YORK

Nos. 719, 644, 645.

143 U.S. 517 (1892)

BUDD v. NEW YORK. NEW YORK ex rel. ANNAN v. WALSH. NEW YORK ex rel. PINTO v. WALSH.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 29, 1892.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Benjamin F. Tracy and Mr. William N. Dykman for Annan and Pinto, plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Spencer Clinton for Budd, plaintiff in error.

Mr. J.A. Hyland for the defendants in error in 644 and 645.

Mr. George T. Quinby filed a brief for the defendants in error in 719.


MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The main question involved in these cases is whether this court will adhere to its decision in Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113.

The Court of Appeals of New York, in People v. Budd, 117 N.Y. 1, held that chapter 581 of the laws of 1888 did not violate the constitutional guarantee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases