1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 9 Wis.2d
  5. 9 Wis.2d 378 (1960)
 

BLOCK v. BLOCK

9 Wis.2d 378 (1960)

BLOCK, Appellant, v. BLOCK, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 2, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Walter M. Block of Chicago, Illinois, in pro. per.

For the respondent there was a brief by Cohen & Parins of Green Bay, and oral argument by Meyer M. Cohen and Robert J. Parins.

BROADFOOT, J.

Actions to modify a divorce judgment are judicial and not administrative proceedings, and are governed by the rules and procedure for conducting judicial proceedings. The orders of a trial court with respect thereto are subject to review and, in order that there may be a review, it is necessary that proceedings be conducted in open court and that the orders be based upon testimony taken by a reporter with witnesses subject to cross-examination. Wunsch...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases