The present case involves the validity of an antenuptial contract in which the parties agreed that their earnings and other property acquired during the marriage would be held as separate property. At the time they entered the agreement, the parties anticipated the early dissolution of their marriage. Relying on In re Marriage of Higgason (1973)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN RE MARRIAGE OF DAWLEY
Docket No. S.F. 23418.
17 Cal.3d 342 (1976)
551 P.2d 323
131 Cal. Rptr. 3
In re the Marriage of BETTY J. and JAMES R. DAWLEY. JAMES R. DAWLEY, Respondent, v. BETTY J. DAWLEY, Appellant.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 29, 1976.
June 29, 1976.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bourhis & Bourhis, Barbara Lawless Bourhis and Randall D. Reedy for Appellant.
Larry A. Ramsey for Respondent.
Supreme Court of California.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
