Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner was not entitled, after his discharge, to a hearing under the collective bargaining agreement. Both parties to that agreement agreed that the phrase "after training" was mistakenly omitted from the printed agreement. With that phrase, the provision in question did not authorize a hearing in the petitioner's case (see, Chimart Assocs. v Paul,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.