1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 86 U.S.
  5. 86 U.S. 646 (____)
 

WARREN v. VAN BRUNT

86 U.S. 646 (____)

19 Wall. 646

WARREN v. VAN BRUNT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. M.S. Wilkinson and C.K. Davis, for the plaintiff in error:

Messrs. J.M. Carlisle and J.D. McPherson, contra.

The CHIEF JUSTICE, having stated the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

When Warren and Van Brunt made their settlement upon the lands, in 1853, they acquired no right of pre-emption, as the act of Congress then in force only gave that right to settlers upon lands in the then Territory of Minnesota which had been surveyed.* On the 4th of August, A.D. 1854, the provisions of the Pre-emption...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases