RAILROAD COMPANY v. ANDROSCOGGIN MILLS


89 U.S. 594 (____)

22 Wall. 594

RAILROAD COMPANY v. ANDROSCOGGIN MILLS.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A. Inglehart, for the plaintiff in error:

Mr. Charles Denby, contra:


Mr. Justice HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

Had the bill of lading contained nothing more than the terms and clauses in the part of it which is before the red-letter clause, the argument made in behalf of the Androscoggin Mills would be a strong one. We must, however, examine the whole contract, and construe and give effect to all its provisions.

This bill of lading, in the first place, is a contract covering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases