1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 54 U.S.
  5. 54 U.S. 12 (____)
 

DARRINGTON ET AL. v. THE BANK OF ALABAMA

54 U.S. 12 (____)

13 How. 12

JOHN DARRINGTON, LORENZO JAMES, AND ROBERT D. JAMES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE BRANCH OF THE BANK OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. JOHN DARRINGTON AND LORENZO JAMES, v. SAME.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Campbell for the plaintiffs in error, and and Mr. Hopkins for the defendants.

Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Alabama, under the 25th section of the act of 1789.

An action was brought in the Circuit Court of Mobile county against the plaintiffs in error, by the commissioners and trustees of the banks of Alabama, under an act of the State, by serving a notice on them in behalf of the Branch of the Bank of the State of Alabama...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases