1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 83 U.S.
  5. 83 U.S. 564 (____)
 

SPECHT v. HOWARD

83 U.S. 564 (____)

16 Wall. 564

SPECHT v. HOWARD ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. D.K. McRae, for the plaintiff in error; Messrs. R.M. Corwine and Quinton Corwine, contra.

Mr. Justice SWAYNE stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendants in error were the plaintiffs in the court below. The action was upon a promissory note made by Jehl & Brother to Specht, and by him indorsed to Howard, Sanger & Co., the plaintiffs. The makers and indorser lived in Memphis. The indorsees lived in the city of New York, and the note was made and indorsed there. No place of payment was mentioned in the note. At its maturity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases