1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 71 U.S.
  5. 71 U.S. 535 (____)
 

VON HOFFMAN v. CITY OF QUINCY

71 U.S. 535 (____)

4 Wall. 535

VON HOFFMAN v. CITY OF QUINCY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. McKinnon and Merrick, for the relator, plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Cushing and Ewing, Jr., contra, for the City of Quincy, defendant in error:

Mr. Justice SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court, and after stating the case, proceeded thus:

The demurrer admits what is set forth in the answer. On the other hand, the answer, according to the law of pleading, admits what is alleged in the petition and not denied.

It is then a part of the case before us, that when the bonds were issued and negotiated there were statutes of Illinois in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases