1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 65 U.S.
  5. 65 U.S. 536 (____)
 

BERTHOLD ET AL. v. GOLDSMITH

65 U.S. 536 (____)

24 How. 536

PIERRE A. BERTHOLD, ALFRED C. BERNONDY, AND MARKLAT THOMPSON, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWARD GOLDSMITH.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Blair for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Carlisle, upon a brief filed by Mr. Badger and himself, for the defendant.

Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. The declaration in this case was filed on the second day of September, 1858, by the present defendant, who was the plaintiff in the court below. It was an action of assumpsit, and the declaration contained five counts. Without attempting to give any very precise analysis of the declaration, it will be sufficient to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases