1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 66 U.S.
  5. 66 U.S. 533 (____)
 

LAW v. CROSS

66 U.S. 533 (____)

1 Black 533

LAW vs. CROSS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S.D. Law, of New York, and Mr. Gillet, of Washington city, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Lane, of New York, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice GRIER.

The objection that this suit should have been brought in the name of Cross, Hobson & Company, instead of Alexander Cross, has no support, either in law or the facts in evidence. The contract on which the suit was brought was with Cross alone. Law had established a line of steamers on the Pacific, to run from Panama to San Francisco. It became necessary to supply them with coal at Valparaiso, and to have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases