ADAMS ET AL. v. ROBERTS


43 U.S. 486 (____)

2 How. 486

AUSTIN L. ADAMS AND ANN C. HARDING, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JULIA ROBERTS.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neale and Bradley, for the plaintiffs in error.

Brent, sen., for the defendant.


Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

We think the court below did no err in refusing to give the instructions asked for by the defendants in either the first or second bill of exceptions.

By the statute of Virginia two modes are pointed out in which manumission by deed can be accomplished.

1. The instrument in writing under the hand and seal of the party must be attested and proved in the County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases