1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 64 U.S.
  5. 64 U.S. 455 (____)
 

JENKINS ET AL. v. BANNING

64 U.S. 455 (____)

23 How. 455

CHARLES E. JENKINS, MOSES KNEELAND, AND JACKSON HADLEY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM S. BANNING.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Gillet for the defendant in error, no counsel appearing for the plaintiffs.

Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes before the court upon a writ of error to the District Court of the United States for the district of Wisconsin. It was an action of debt upon a judgment recovered by the present defendant against the plaintiffs in error, in the District Court of the United States for the second judicial district of the Territory of Minnesota. As originally framed, the declaration did not contain any caption specifying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases