1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 97 U.S.
  5. 97 U.S. 365 (____)
 

ARTHUR v. MOLLER

97 U.S. 365 (____)

ARTHUR v. MOLLER.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Assistant-Attorney-General Smith for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. James B. Craig, contra.

MR. JUSTICE HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

We think that the decision of the court below was correct.

In Arthur v. Rheims (96 U.S. 143), it was held that the fact that artificial flowers were a manufacture of cotton did not determine that they were dutiable as components of cotton, but that they were properly taxable under the specific designation of "artificial flowers."<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases