1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 30 U.S.
  5. 30 U.S. 402 (____)
 

BRADSTREET v. HUNTINGTON

30 U.S. 402 (____)

5 Pet. 402

JAMES JACKSON, EX DEM. OF MARTHA BRADSTREET, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR vs. HENRY HUNTINGTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr Mayer, and Mr Webster for the plaintiff in error: and by Mr Storrs and Mr Spencer for the defendant.

Mr Webster and Mr Mayer for the plaintiff in error.

Mr Spencer and Mr Storrs, for the defendant.

Mr. Justice JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

The principles of law involved in this cause are few and simple; and well established; and all the difficulties consist in so arranging the facts as to apply the principles correctly; or rather, to determine whether they have been correctly applied in the court below.

The plaintiff here was plaintiff there, and the action being ejectment, a remedy rigidly legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases