1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 65 U.S.
  5. 65 U.S. 357 (____)
 

TATE ET AL. v. CARNEY ET AL.

65 U.S. 357 (____)

24 How. 357

CHARLES TATE AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN G. CARNEY AND OTHERS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was submitted on a printed argument by Mr. Benjamin for the plaintiffs in error, and argued by Mr. Taylor for the defendants.

Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause comes before this court by a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, under the 25th section of the Judiciary act of September, 1789. The defendant in error (Carney) commenced a suit in the District Court of the 8th judicial district of Louisiana, in which he asserted that he had purchased, in the year 1844, at the probate sale of the succession of Sarah Cohern, deceased, five...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases