WILKINSON v. NICKLIN


2 U.S. 396 (____)

2 Dall. 396

WILKINSON et al. versus NICKLIN et al.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ingersoll and Lewis, for the plaintiffs. E. Tilghman and Dallas, for the defendants.


CHASE, Justice.

The defence cannot be admitted. There is no rule more perfectly established, there is none which ought to be held more sacred in commercial transactions, than that the blank indorsement of a bill of exchange passes all the interest in the bill, to every indorsee, in succession, discharged from any obligation, which might subsist between the original parties, but which does not appear upon the face of the instrument itself.

PETERS, Justice....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases